| Representative Cases Nonjudicial Punishment |
Article 15/Captain's Mast/NJP
An E-5 was given an Article 15 for dereliction of duty,
found guilty and was reduced to E-4. On appeal, Mr.
George personally appeared before the appellate
authority, an 0-6, and negotiated a deal in which the
appeal was dropped and the client's reduction was
suspended (his E-5 rank was conditionally restored.)
An E-2 was given an Article 15 for failure to go to her
place of duty. Mr. George did a thorough investigation
and following a meeting with the client's commander, the
Article 15 was withdrawn.
An E-3 was given an Article 15 for passing a bad check.
Despite not having a receipt or the check, Mr. George
convinced the command that the client had repaid the
money and the Article 15 was withdrawn.
An E-5 was given an Article 15 for sleeping on duty. Mr.
George wrote a detailed memo arguing that the
government produced insufficient evidence to support
the charge. The member was found not guilty and the
Article 15 was dismissed.
These are representative cases from our
representation of military members. Please note
that each case is unique and has specific legal and
factual circumstances which affect the result. These
cases are provided for informational purposes only
and are in no way a guarantee of any particular result
in a future case.
An E-5 was given an Article 15 for dereliction of duty,
found guilty and was reduced to E-4. On appeal, Mr.
George personally appeared before the appellate
authority, an 0-6, and negotiated a deal in which the
appeal was dropped and the client's reduction was
suspended (his E-5 rank was conditionally restored.)
An E-2 was given an Article 15 for failure to go to her
place of duty. Mr. George did a thorough investigation
and following a meeting with the client's commander, the
Article 15 was withdrawn.
An E-3 was given an Article 15 for passing a bad check.
Despite not having a receipt or the check, Mr. George
convinced the command that the client had repaid the
money and the Article 15 was withdrawn.
An E-5 was given an Article 15 for sleeping on duty. Mr.
George wrote a detailed memo arguing that the
government produced insufficient evidence to support
the charge. The member was found not guilty and the
Article 15 was dismissed.
These are representative cases from our
representation of military members. Please note
that each case is unique and has specific legal and
factual circumstances which affect the result. These
cases are provided for informational purposes only
and are in no way a guarantee of any particular result
in a future case.
 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
| Call Us Toll Free at 1-877-569-6941 For a Free Initial Consultation |
| SUBMIT A CASE FOR OUR REVIEW |
 |  |
Copyright 2011, Britt, Hankins & Moughan
