| Representative Cases Nonjudicial Punishment |
 |
 |
Copyright 2010, Britt, Hankins & Moughan
| Submit a Case for Our Review |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Call Us Toll Free at 1-877-569-6941 For a Free Initial Consultation |
Article 15/Captain's Mast/NJP
An E-5 was given an Article 15 for dereliction of duty,
found guilty and was reduced to E-4. On appeal, Mr.
George personally appeared before the appellate
authority, an 0-6, and negotiated a deal in which the
appeal was dropped and the client's reduction was
suspended (his E-5 rank was conditionally restored.)
An E-2 was given an Article 15 for failure to go to her place
of duty. Mr. George did a thorough investigation and
following a meeting with the client's commander, the
Article 15 was withdrawn.
An E-3 was given an Article 15 for passing a bad check.
Despite not having a receipt or the check, Mr. George
convinced the command that the client had repaid the
money and the Article 15 was withdrawn.
An E-5 was given an Article 15 for sleeping on duty. Mr.
George wrote a detailed memo arguing that the
government produced insufficient evidence to support the
charge. The member was found not guilty and the Article
15 was dismissed.
These are representative cases from our
representation of military members. Please note that
each case is unique and has specific legal and factual
circumstances which affect the result. These cases
are provided for informational purposes only and are in
no way a guarantee of any particular result in a future
case.
An E-5 was given an Article 15 for dereliction of duty,
found guilty and was reduced to E-4. On appeal, Mr.
George personally appeared before the appellate
authority, an 0-6, and negotiated a deal in which the
appeal was dropped and the client's reduction was
suspended (his E-5 rank was conditionally restored.)
An E-2 was given an Article 15 for failure to go to her place
of duty. Mr. George did a thorough investigation and
following a meeting with the client's commander, the
Article 15 was withdrawn.
An E-3 was given an Article 15 for passing a bad check.
Despite not having a receipt or the check, Mr. George
convinced the command that the client had repaid the
money and the Article 15 was withdrawn.
An E-5 was given an Article 15 for sleeping on duty. Mr.
George wrote a detailed memo arguing that the
government produced insufficient evidence to support the
charge. The member was found not guilty and the Article
15 was dismissed.
These are representative cases from our
representation of military members. Please note that
each case is unique and has specific legal and factual
circumstances which affect the result. These cases
are provided for informational purposes only and are in
no way a guarantee of any particular result in a future
case.